Picture this: Youâre in the middle of an interview. Youâve nailed the "Tell me about yourself" opener. Youâve navigated the questions about your strengths and weaknesses. Youâre feeling good. Then, the interviewer leans back, narrows their eyes slightly, and drops a bomb:
"What is one thing that is broken at your current company, and how would you fix it?"
Or, even trickier: "Based on what you've seen so far, what is one thing wrong with our product/company, and how would you fix it?"
Panic sets in. Your palms start to sweat. It feels like a trap. If you're honest, you might sound like a complainer or a "hater." If you say "nothing," you look like you lack critical thinking skills or you're hiding something.
Whether you are a recent grad trying to break into the workforce, an F-1 student racing against the clock for sponsorship, or a career pivot-er feeling like an underdog, this question can be a career-killer if you donât handle it right.
But hereâs the secret: This question is actually your best opportunity to shine.
Itâs not about airing dirty laundry; itâs about proving you are a problem solver. In this guide, weâre going to break down exactly why recruiters ask this, the traps you need to avoid, and give you a fool-proof framework to turn this awkward moment into a job offer.
To master this answer, you first have to understand the psychology behind it. Hiring managers aren't just looking for gossip about your current boss or your frustrations with the coffee machine. They are looking for specific behavioral indicators.
When you are an "underdog," maybe you come from a non-target school or a non-traditional background, you have to prove that you possess the mindset of an owner, not just an employee.
Here is what they are actually testing when they ask whatâs broken:
Companies want to hire people who can see the big picture. Can you tell the difference between a one-time annoyance (like a printer jam) and a systemic inefficiency (like a broken procurement process that costs the company thousands of dollars)? They want to know if you can identify friction points that slow down the business.
This is the "Vibe Check." When things go wrong, do you point fingers and blame others? Or do you roll up your sleeves and look for solutions? Recruiters are terrified of hiring "energy vampires," people who constantly complain but never offer to help. They want to see if you can discuss a negative topic with a positive, constructive tone.
Itâs easy to say something is broken. Itâs hard to fix it. This question is a stealth way of asking, "Walk me through your problem-solving process." Do you use data? Do you consult your team? Do you think about budget? They want to see the gears turning in your head.
If you answer the version of this question about their company ("Whatâs wrong with us?"), they are testing your diplomacy. Can you give constructive feedback without being rude or arrogant? This is crucial for roles that require cross-functional collaboration.
Before we build the perfect answer, letâs look at the wreckage of failed interviews. Most candidates blow this question because they fall into one of three specific traps.
This is the most common mistake. The candidate takes the question as an invitation to vent.
This happens when a candidate is too afraid to say anything negative.
This candidate gives a high-level, generic answer that doesn't actually mean anything.
Now that we know what not to do, letâs build your winning answer. At Wonsulting, we believe in structures that turn "underdogs" into winners. Weâre going to use a modified version of the STAR method (Situation, Task, Action, Result) specifically tailored for this question.
We call this the Constructive Optimizer approach. You aren't "fixing a disaster"; you are "optimizing a process."
The "thing that is broken" should never be a human being. It should be a workflow, a tool, a system, or a communication loop.
By focusing on the process, you remove the emotional "drama" and focus on the business logic. This makes you look objective and professional.
Don't just say itâs broken, prove it. Use data if you can. This is especially important for our F-1 visa students and STEM graduates, as it highlights your analytical skills.
See the difference? The second version frames the "broken" thing as a business cost (time and accuracy).
This is where you show your value. How would you fix it? Be realistic. Don't suggest buying a million-dollar software if the company is a startup. Suggest a solution that is actionable.
Finish strong by describing what the world looks like after your fix.
Different "underdogs" need different strategies. Here is how to tailor your answer depending on where you are in your career journey.
The Challenge: You might feel like you don't have enough experience to criticize a company's operations. You might suffer from Imposter Syndrome. The Strategy: Focus on efficiency. As a digital native, you likely know shortcuts or tools that older generations don't.Â
The Script:
"In my last internship, I noticed that the weekly reporting process was 'broken' in the sense that it was entirely manual. We were copy-pasting numbers from three different spreadsheets into a master doc. It worked, but it took four hours every Friday.
If I were to fix it, I would set up a simple macro or use a tool like Zapier to automate that data pull. This would not only save four hours a week, adding up to 200 hours a year, but it would also remove the risk of human error in copy-pasting. I love finding small workflow hacks like that to save time.â
Why this works: It shows you value time and know how to use technology to solve problems, which is a massive plus for entry-level roles.
The Challenge: Youâve been in the game for a while (5-10 years). Youâre frustrated with bureaucracy. You need to sound senior and strategic.Â
The Strategy: Focus on communication silos. This is a universal problem that shows you are thinking about leadership and cross-functional success.Â
The Script:
"One thing that is 'broken' in many organizations Iâve seen, including my current one, is the feedback loop between the Product team and the Customer Success team. Often, CS hears about bugs or feature requests, but that data gets lost in Slack channels and never makes it to the Product roadmap effectively.
To fix this, I would implement a structured bi-weekly sync or a shared ticketing tag specifically for 'Customer Friction.' This ensures that the Product team builds what users actually need. In my experience, closing this gap can reduce churn significantly because customers feel heard."
Why this works: It positions you as a bridge-builder who cares about the customer and the product, not just your own desk.
The Challenge: You are moving from teaching to tech, or hospitality to sales. Youâre worried your past experience isn't relevant.Â
The Strategy: Frame your "outsider" perspective as a superpower. You see things industry insiders miss. The Script (Teacher to Project Manager):
"Coming from an education background, I look at onboarding processes very closely. One thing that was "broken" at my last school, and I see it in corporate settings too, is assuming that simply emailing a manual counts as training.â
To fix this, I would restructure onboarding into active learning modules with checkpoints. Instead of just reading a PDF, new hires would complete a mini-project in their first week. In my classroom, moving from passive reading to active doing increased retention by 40%. Iâd apply that same pedagogy to team training to ramp up new hires faster."
Why this works: It validates your past experience and directly applies it to a business KPI (ramp-up time).
This is the "Hard Mode" version of the question. They are asking you to critique the company you are interviewing with. This is dangerous ground.
Do NOT:
DO:
The Script:
"I spent some time going through your user signup flow to prepare for this conversation. I wouldn't say it's 'broken,' but I did notice a friction point where users have to click three times to get to the pricing page.
If I were in this role, Iâd love to run an A/B test to see if simplifying that menu structure would increase conversion rates. Iâm really curious to see if thatâs something the team has looked at!"
This shows you did your homework (Authority) but you are humble enough to ask if theyâve already tested it (Empathy).
Preparing these stories takes time, and you need to make sure you sound confident, not cocky. Here is how the Wonsulting suite can help you prep:
When that scary question comes up, take a breath. Smile. Youâve got this. Just remember the checklist:
Being an underdog means you have to work smarter. You have to prove that you see inefficiencies others ignore and have the grit to fix them. By answering this question correctly, you aren't just a candidate; youâre a consultant adding value before youâre even hired.
Now, go find something broken and tell them how youâll fix it.

Try WonsultingAIâs free tools to outsmart the hiring code or work 1:1 with expert coaches who know how to get you hired.
"Wonsulting gave me clarity. Their resume guidance and LinkedIn networking strategies completely changed how I approached applications. Even when results didnât come right away, I kept applying what I learned refining my resume, networking intentionally, and following their advice step by step.Eventually, it all paid off, I landed a Software Engineer role at Google."

